mohsen

Curriculum Vitae
Full Name
Mohsen Manesh
First Name
Mohsen
Last Name
Manesh
Affiliation
Faculty
Title
Mr. & Mrs. L.L. Stewart Professor of Business Law | Associate Dean of Faculty Research & Programs | Faculty Director, Portland Program
Phone
503-412-3749
Office
70 NW Couch St., Ste 242
City
Portland Program
Departments
Law
Law-JD
Programs, Research and Outreach
Business Law
Profile Section
Biography

Professor Manesh's scholarship focuses on the intersections of corporate, contract and LLC law. He has authored articles in the N.Y.U. Law Review, Boston College Law Review, North Carolina Law Review, Florida State University Law Review, and the Journal of Corporation Law, among others. His scholarship has been cited in leading casebooks and more than 30 court decisions, including opinions of the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals, Delaware Supreme Court and Delaware Court of Chancery. In 2023, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals en banc cited Professor Manesh’s scholarship in a consequential decision raising doubts about the continued validity of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1964 decision in J.I. Case Co. v. Borak.

At Oregon Law, Professor Manesh teaches a variety of business law courses covering corporations, LLCs, securities regulation, contracts, and mergers & acquisitions. In recognition of his classroom teaching, he has received the Orlando J. Hollis Faculty Teaching Award, the law school's highest teaching honor. 
 
Professor Manesh is also the faculty director of the law school's Portland Program. Located on the University of Oregon’s Portland campus, the Portland Program enables JD students the unique opportunity to spend their third year of law school, building a portfolio of real-world experience, specialized course work, and personal connections in Oregon’s largest city. 
 
Prior to joining Oregon Law, Professor Manesh was an attorney in the Seattle office of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. His practice focused on corporate finance and business transactions, representing clients ranging from small, venture-backed start-ups to publicly traded corporations.
 
Professor Manesh earned his undergraduate degree in industrial engineering summa cum laude from the University of Arkansas and his law degree magna cum laude from Georgetown University, where he was named Order of the Coif. While at Georgetown, Professor Manesh served as notes editor for the Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics. As a student, his writing was awarded first place in the Journal of Business and Securities Law's Elliot A. Spoon Business Law Writing Competition, honorable mention in the American Bar Association's Mendes Hershman Student Writing Competition and recognized with the St. Thomas More Award from the Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics.

 

Publications
 
The Corporate Contract and Shareholder Arbitration, 98 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1106 (2023) (co-authored with Joseph A. Grundfest).
 
Abandoned and Split But Never Reversed: Borak and Federal Court Derivative Litigation, 78 Bus. Law. 1047 (2023) (co-authored with Joseph A. Grundfest).
 
 
The Contested Edges of Internal Affairs, 87 Tenn. L. Rev. 251 (2020).
 
Fiduciary Principles in Unincorporated Entity Law, in The Oxford Handbook of Fiduciary Law (Evan J. Criddle, Paul B. Miller, and Robert H. Sitkoff, eds., Oxford University Press, 2019).
 
 
Creatures of Contract: A Half-Truth about LLCs, 42 Del. J. Corp. L. 391 (2018).
 
 
Equity in LLC Law?, 44 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 93 (2016).
 
Dictum in Alternative Entity Jurisprudence and the Expansion of Judicial Power in Delaware, in Research Handbook on Partnerships, LLCs and Alternative Forms of Business Organizations (2015).
 
Nearing 30, Is Revlon Showing its Age?, 71 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. Online 107 (2014).
 
 
 
 
 
 
Legal Asymmetry and the End of Corporate Law, 34 Del. J. Corp. L. 465 (2009).
 
The Immorality of Theft, The Amorality of Infringement, 2006 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 5.
 
Indeterminacy and Self Enforcement: A Defense of Delaware's Approach to Director Independence in Derivative Litigation, 6 J. Bus. & Sec. L. 177 (2006).
 
The New Class Action Rule: Procedural Reforms in an Ethical Vacuum, 18 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 923 (2005).
Updated

Member for

5 years 1 month